<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-22T09:05:11Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/242920" metadataPrefix="dim">https://api.mountainscholar.org/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/242920</identifier><datestamp>2026-05-22T20:12:12Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10217_100532</setSpec><setSpec>com_10217_100000</setSpec><setSpec>com_10217_100470</setSpec><setSpec>com_10217_100303</setSpec><setSpec>col_10217_100538</setSpec><setSpec>col_10217_100472</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Wood, John Joseph, author</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Troxell, Wade, advisor</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Sakurai, Hiroshi, committee member</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Jensen, Daniel, committee member</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Bjostad, Louis, committee member</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2026-01-23T17:30:02Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2002</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier">ETDF_2002_Wood_3064028.pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/10217/242920</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://doi.org/10.25675/3.025777</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">Successful engineering design results from die application of suitable product design
 methods to an identified customer need. The generation and evaluation of conceptual
 designs satisfying engineering and customer requirements is a primary purpose of
 existing methods. Numerical and experimental techniques often can determine the
 feasibility of meeting the specified performance requirements.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">The concept generation design phase is expanded through a formalized process
 geared toward die design evolution of products characterized specifically by reduced part
 count through the incorporation of compliant materials and structures. Compliance offers
 a new dimension to evolutionary product design by introducing flexible components for
 direct component combination or replacement. Effort flow analysis is a technique that
 provides a framework for identifying component combination opportunities. This
 graphical method maps the flow of effort across component interfaces and systematically
 provides insights based upon the type of relative motion required between them.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">A formalized method for identifying and classifying these component groups is
 developed. An empirical study of existing products is conducted with the outcome being
 a deduced set of product evolution specific directive guidelines. The derived guidelines
 support the directed product evolution effort flow analysis methodology.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">Evaluation of conceptual designs is critical in the determination of functional
 performance. Similarity methods offer performance predictions of products based upon
 functional testing of scale models to correlate measured model behavior with predicted
 product behavior. Traditional methods can be improved in both accuracy and domain of
 applicability by the infusion of empirical data, derived from simplified tests, into the
 equations that characterize the system parameters of interest. Similarity methods have
 been developed that overcome the constraints associated with the traditional methods and
 provide increased analysis capability and improved insight into the phenomenon
 governing the problem.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">The product evolutionary design methodology incorporates an analytical feasibility
 determination to provide a conceptual design and evaluation approach for design
 focusing on component combination and incorporation of compliant solutions. The
 method has demonstrated successful evolutionary design of compliant systems and
 accurate similarity-based predictions of product performance. Future endeavors include
 expansion of effort flow analysis and advanced similarity methods to include the design
 of systems outside the mechanical domain.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="medium">born digital</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="medium">doctoral dissertations</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language">English</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher">Colorado State University. Libraries</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="relation" qualifier="ispartof">2000-2019</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights">Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="license">Per the terms of a contractual agreement, all use of this item is limited to the non-commercial use of Colorado State University and its authorized users.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject">mechanical engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject">industrial engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Design methodology using empirical and virtual analysis with application to compliant systems</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">Text</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="level">Doctoral</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="discipline">Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="grantor">Colorado State University</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dcterms" element="rights" qualifier="dpla">This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>